Southwest Airlines’ Generic Competitive Strategy & Growth Strategies

Southwest Airlines generic competitive strategy, competitive advantages, intensive growth strategies, Porter, Ansoff, business analysis, William Hobby
A Southwest aircraft at William P. Hobby Airport, Houston, Texas. Southwest Airlines’ competitive strategy and intensive growth strategies optimize profits and market share based on low costs and low fares. (Image adapted from photo by ArtisticOperations)

Southwest Airlines’ generic competitive strategy (Porter’s model) ensures product/service attractiveness and competitive advantages, which support the success of the company’s intensive growth strategies (Ansoff Matrix).

In Michael E. Porter’s model, competitive advantage is developed through generic competitive strategies that the airline company applies. On the other hand, based on Igor Ansoff’s matrix, Southwest Airlines can use various intensive growth strategies.

Southwest Airlines uses its generic competitive strategy to counteract the competitive power of other commercial aviation firms, such as Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, and American Airlines.

Southwest’s low fares and high accessibility relate to the company’s intensive growth strategies and generic competitive strategy. The intensive growth strategies facilitate the operational scale needed for Southwest’s generic strategy for competitive advantages and industry positioning.

Southwest’s Generic Competitive Strategy (Porter’s Model)

Southwest Airlines’ generic competitive strategy is cost leadership, which creates competitive advantages based on low costs that, in this business case, enables correspondingly low prices for airfare.

To address competition, the company’s strategic objective with this generic competitive strategy is to minimize operating costs and optimize profit margins while keeping low prices for its airline services to capture a bigger share of the market.

The large-scale operations linked to this generic strategy for competitive advantage support multinational growth for the fulfillment of Southwest Airlines’ mission statement and vision statement, which aim for leadership in the global airline industry.

The benefits of cost leadership as a generic competitive strategy is observable in Southwest Airlines’ service offerings as a low-cost carrier. The company’s advertising campaigns frequently emphasize low fares as a selling point, in contrast to the focus or differentiation strategy of other firms, such as Delta Air Lines.

In a way, Southwest has a best-cost provider strategy, as the company continues to minimize costs while also maintaining a high level of customer satisfaction through service quality and competitive pricing.

Based on its generic competitive strategy, Southwest presents itself as a major commercial aviation contender in terms of price and in terms of warmth and friendliness in its customer service.

Southwest’s Intensive Growth Strategies (Ansoff Matrix)

Market Penetration

Southwest Airlines applies market penetration as its primary intensive growth strategy. The objective of market penetration as an intensive strategy is to grow the company’s revenues by providing more of its current air transportation services to more passengers in markets where it currently operates.

Southwest’s generic strategy of cost leadership ensures low costs that enable across-the-board low prices that are a competitive advantage for keeping a large share of the commercial aviation market, in support of market penetration as an intensive growth strategy.

The price sensitivity of Southwest Airlines’ target customers is one of the main factors that make cost leadership and market penetration effective strategies for business development and success in this case.

The business strengths and competitive advantages identified in the SWOT analysis of Southwest Airlines help attract customers and support the success of market penetration. For example, the company’s strong airline brand and attractive prices enable this intensive growth strategy.

Also, Southwest Airlines’ marketing mix (4P) determines how the company penetrates the target market using this growth strategy. For example, the pricing strategies, promotion tactics, and places in this marketing mix define the company’s approach to reach more travelers.

Southwest Airlines competitive strategy and growth strategies, Porter, Ansoff, travel business competitive advantages case study, Florida
A view of a Southwest airplane wing while flying over Florida. Southwest Airlines’ growth strategies and generic competitive strategy use cost advantages for competitive pricing to grow the business. (Image adapted from photo by Kyle Brown)

Product Development

Product development is a minor intensive growth strategy in Southwest’s organizational and business development. This growth strategy has a limited contribution to the success of the airline business.

Southwest’s product evolution has already stabilized, which means that the business now mainly aims its product development efforts mostly at enhancing its current offerings to improve customer experience and product competitiveness.

Changes in current products require corresponding changes in Southwest Airlines’ operations management, which applies the company’s intensive growth strategies and generic competitive strategy.

For this intensive growth strategy, Southwest’s generic competitive strategy of cost leadership requires that new products must satisfy low cost targets that match the company’s low-cost carrier business model.

The organizational culture (corporate culture) of Southwest Airlines is also a factor integrated into product development, as the company relies on organizational cultural variables to optimize service quality and customer satisfaction and loyalty.

Market Development

The growth of Southwest Airlines currently only minimally depends on market development. This intensive growth strategy aims to offer current services to new commercial aviation markets.

In applying market development, the generic competitive strategy of cost leadership ensures cost-based competitive advantages that enable Southwest’s pricing competitiveness in new markets.

However, Southwest continues to focus on its limited multinational operations in the United States and a few other countries. Thus, market development is not a significant intensive growth strategy of the airline business.

Diversification

Diversification is a minimal intensive growth strategy for Southwest Airlines. The objective of this intensive strategy is to grow the company through new operations, such as service businesses related to air travel operations.

Southwest focuses on growing within its current markets, with the generic competitive strategy of cost leadership strengthening the company’s share of the market. There is no significant indication that the company plans major business diversification outside the airline business.

It is notable that the addition or expansion of business operations requires accompanying changes in Southwest Airlines’ organizational structure (business structure) to provide organizational support for the needs of new or changed operations.

Key Points – Southwest’s Competitive Strategy & Growth Strategies

Southwest Airlines applies cost leadership as its generic strategy for competitive advantage, along with intensive growth strategies to maximize market share and move toward its long-term goal of becoming a global industry leader.

Market penetration as a growth strategy supports the airline company’s generic competitive strategy of cost leadership, and vice versa. Southwest’s low-cost brand image and service quality reflect these strategies and associated competitive advantages.

For example, customers know the company for its competitive airfares, which is made possible through cost leadership as a generic competitive strategy that leads to cost-based competitive advantages.

Also, Southwest Airlines’ large-scale operations reflect market penetration as an intensive growth strategy. Market penetration adds to the company’s scale, which comes with economies of scale that strengthen the generic competitive strategy of cost leadership.

References