Apple Inc.’s organizational structure contributes to effective and rapid innovation, which is a critical success factor of the business in the information technology, online services, and consumer electronics industries. A company’s organizational or corporate structure is the combination of workforce groups, resources, and interconnections among these groups and resources in the business. The organizational design determines how the organizational structure is developed and managed. In this business analysis case of Apple Inc., the corporate structure supports strategies that push for further technological innovation. The company’s structural characteristics maintain a traditional hierarchy, with some key elements from other types of organizational structure. Apple Inc.’s success is linked to innovation and the leadership of Steve Jobs, and its corporate structure is partly responsible for ensuring support for such leadership. Now, under Tim Cook’s leadership, Apple has made some small changes in its organizational structure to suit current global market and industry demands.
Apple’s organizational structure is effective in supporting business performance to ensure leadership in the industry, especially with regard to competing against Google, Microsoft, IBM, Intel, Amazon.com, Sony, PayPal, and many other firms. The Porter’s Five Forces analysis of Apple Inc. determines that these competitors impose the strong force of competitive rivalry in the company’s external environment. Still, through the effective use and evolution of its corporate structure, Apple continues to improve its capabilities and competitive advantages, especially in the area of rapid and creative innovation and product design for competitive products in the international market.
Apple’s Organizational Structure Type and Characteristics
Apple Inc. has a hierarchical organizational structure, with notable divisional characteristics and a weak functional matrix. The hierarchy is a traditional structural feature in business organizations. The divisional characteristics refer to the product-based grouping within Apple, such as for iOS and macOS. The weak functional matrix involves inter-divisional collaboration, while the hierarchy is preserved. The following are the main characteristics of Apple’s corporate structure:
- Spoke-and-wheel hierarchy
- Product-based divisions
- Weak functional matrix
Spoke-and-Wheel Hierarchy. A bird’s-eye view of Apple’s organizational structure shows considerable hierarchy. In the past, everything went through Steve Jobs. Jobs made all the major strategic management decisions. However, under Tim Cook’s leadership, this hierarchy in Apple’s corporate structure has slightly changed. The company now has more collaboration among different parts of the organization, such as software teams and hardware teams. Apple’s vice presidents have more autonomy, which was limited and minimal under Jobs. Thus, the company’s organizational structure is now less rigid, but still has a spoke-and-wheel hierarchy where Tim Cook is at the center. The upper tier (innermost tier in the spoke-and-wheel circle) of the corporate structure has function-based grouping, which is an element derived from the functional type of organizational structure. Senior vice presidents who report to Tim Cook handle business functions. For example, Apple has a senior vice president for retail, and a senior vice president for worldwide marketing. In this structural feature, the company’s top leaders address business needs in terms of business function areas.
Product-based Divisions. The upper and lower tiers of Apple’s corporate structure has product-based divisions, which is an element derived from the divisional type of organizational structure. There are senior vice presidents and vice presidents for different outputs or products. For example, Apple has a Senior Vice President for Software Engineering (iOS and macOS), a Senior Vice President for Hardware Engineering (Mac, iPhone, iPad and iPod), and a Senior Vice President for Hardware Technologies (hardware components). Apple Inc.’s marketing mix or 4P is linked to this structural characteristic. This aspect of the corporate structure is used to manage specific products or product components that the company delivers to its target customers.
Weak Functional Matrix. Apple Inc.’s weak functional matrix refers to the collaborative interactions among various components of the business. In a weak functional matrix, top management determines project direction, while project heads have limited authority and control. For example, the corporate structure allows hardware teams to collaborate with software teams. In this way, the company facilitates information dissemination that is necessary for innovation processes. This structural feature contributes to effective and rapid innovation processes, which are a major business strength shown in the SWOT analysis of Apple Inc. Through this characteristic of the organizational structure, the company maintains strong innovation processes that support brand development and the use of premium-pricing strategies.
Apple Inc.’s Corporate Structure – Advantages, Disadvantages, Recommendations
Strong Corporate Control. The hierarchy in Apple’s organizational structure supports strong management control in the organization. Theoretically, hierarchy empowers top leaders like Tim Cook to control everything in the organization. Through the hierarchy, business functions and product-based groups are effectively controlled through the decisions of the CEO and other top executives. This advantage of Apple Inc.’s corporate structure facilitates rapid and effective strategic management implementation, and helps in establishing coherence throughout the entire organization.
Limited Organizational Flexibility. Apple’s corporate structure has the downside of low flexibility. Hierarchy typically prevents lower levels of the structure to flexibly respond to current business needs and market demands. For example, the company’s product-based divisions must wait for directives from the CEO or other top executives to proceed in implementing changes that address trends in the market for consumer electronics. However, Tim Cook has already made slight improvements by increasing collaboration among different parts of the firm. Such collaboration improves organizational flexibility. Still, Apple’s organizational structure does not support rapid changes because everything must go through Tim Cook and the top management.
- Apple Inc. – Form 10-K.
- Apple Inc. – Leadership.
- Apple Inc.’s Website.
- Csaszar, F. A. (2013). An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organization Science, 24(4), 1083-1101.
- Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Organizational structure and innovation revisited: From organic to ambidextrous structure. Handbook of Organizational Creativity, 502-503.
- Heracleous, L. (2013). Quantum Strategy at Apple Inc. Organizational Dynamics, 42(2), 92-99.
- Lehman, G., & Haslam, C. (2013, December). Accounting for the Apple Inc. business model: Corporate value capture and dysfunctional economic and social consequences. In Accounting Forum (Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 245-248). Elsevier.
- Marengo, L., & Pasquali, C. (2012). How to get what you want when you do not know what you want: A model of incentives, organizational structure, and learning. Organization Science, 23(5), 1298-1310.
- Sakhartov, A. V. (2016). Selecting Corporate Structure for Diversified Firms. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 11521). New York: Academy of Management.
- Salimova, T. A., Biryukova, L. I., Makolov, V. I., & Levina, T. A. (2015). Conceptual provisions of formation of the quality management system within the integrated corporate structure. International Business Management, 9(6), 1129-1135.
- U.S. Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration – The Media and Entertainment Industry in the United States.
- U.S. Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration – The Semiconductors Industry in the United States.
- U.S. Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration – The Software and Information Technology Services Industry in the United States.
- Zaks, Y., & Tsanakas, A. (2014). Optimal capital allocation in a hierarchical corporate structure. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 56, 48-55.